Delay & Disruption Solutions
We undertake forensic delay analysis to determine ‘excusable’, ‘non-excusable’, ‘compensable’, and ‘non-compensable’ delays, including identification of any ‘mitigation’ and ‘acceleration measures’ implemented.
Forensic Delay Analysis And Disruption Analysis
To support claims for ongoing, completed and disputed engineering and construction projects, we undertake forensic delay analysis.
We are experienced in identifying and executing a suitable method for assessment of delays from a variety of delay analysis methods(both prospective and/or retrospective methods), including the most common Critical Path Method analysis methodologies, such as:
Impacted As Planned
Analysis (IAP)
The As Planned versus As Built Windows Analysis (APAB)
As-built
But-for Analysis
Time Impact
Analysis (TIA)
The Retrospective
Longest Path Analysis
Time Slice Windows
Analysis (TSWA)
The Collapsed As
Built Analysis
The process of execution of delay analysis by our experts typically involves, assessment of critical and near critical path activities identification of the origins and causes of delay, cause and effect, magnitude of critical and non-critical delays, apportionment/ allocation of critical delays according to each party’s actions or inactions, and then assessment of critical delays that are ‘excusable’, ‘non-excusable’, ‘compensable (non-concurrent)’, ‘non-compensable (concurrent)’ based on concurrency analysis.
We are experienced in estimating and assessing quantum of various time-related cost claims (commonly known as “Prolongation Claims”), including but not limited to the following:
On-Site Overhead Claim
Head-Office Overhead Claim
Loss of Profit Claim
Interest Claims
Our experts are also experienced in conducting Disruption Analysis and Productivity Loss analysis, including the most common methodologies, such as:
Baseline productivity analysis;
Earned value analysis (EVA);
Measured mile analysis.
Get In Touch
Please fill in the form to contact us directly.
